By Cindi Choi.
Updated Feb 15, 2022
BOULDER, Colo. (PRWEB) February 15, 2022 - A recent policy brief from the Beacon Center of Tennessee describes the states K-12 finance formula and makes recommendations for reform. According to a new review, however, there is little if any peer-reviewed research to support the briefs findings. In fact, several recent studies present contradictory findings.
Professor David S. Knight of the University of Washington reviewed The Basic Education Program: How the Volunteer States Education Funding Formula Doesnt Make the Grade. The brief asserts that Tennessee should replace its resource-based formula with a student-based formula more closely resembling the approach used in some other states.
The briefs key empirical claims include the following: (a) resource-based funding models privilege resource allocation over students needs; (b) student-based funding models are inherently more equitable, efficient, and transparent; and (c) imposing spending regulations to control the percent of funds allocated to instruction, student support, and administration would improve student outcomes.
Professor Knight contends that little empirical work explores these issues, suggesting a need for more research in this area prior to advancing strong policy recommendations. Accordingly, he concludes that while the brief is commendable in its call to action and emphasis on equity and transparency, it provides limited actionable information. Policymakers should thus read this report with caution and pair their reading with materials that provide more nuanced perspectives.
Find the review, by David S. Knight, at: https://nepc.colorado.edu/thinktank/tn-funding
Find The Basic Education Program: How the Volunteer States Education Funding Formula Doesnt Make the Grade, written by Ron Shultis and Jason Edmonds and published by the Beacon Center of Tennessee, at: https://www.beacontn.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/BCN_StudentFunding_Proof2.pdf
NEPC Reviews (http://thinktankreview.org) provide the public, policymakers, and the press with timely, academically sound reviews of selected publications. NEPC Reviews are made possible in part by support provided by the Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice: http://www.greatlakescenter.org
The National Education Policy Center (NEPC), a university research center housed at the University of Colorado Boulder School of Education, produces and disseminates high-quality, peer-reviewed research to inform education policy discussions. Visit us at: https://nepc.colorado.edu